Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rieser

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rieser

647 N.E.2d 1366, 72 Ohio St. 3d 130
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 3, 1995
DocketNo. 94-2650
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 647 N.E.2d 1366 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rieser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rieser, 647 N.E.2d 1366, 72 Ohio St. 3d 130 (Ohio 1995).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and agree that respondent neglected two cases in violation of DR 6-101(A)(3). We also agree with the recommended sanction. Therefore, we hereby reprimand David Paul Rieser for this misconduct. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would dismiss the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Columbus Bar Association v. Rieser.
2018 Ohio 3860 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2018)
Columbus Bar Assn. v. Rieser
2001 Ohio 1306 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Rieser
1995 Ohio 67 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
647 N.E.2d 1366, 72 Ohio St. 3d 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-rieser-ohio-1995.