Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rieser

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rieser

647 N.E.2d 1366, 72 Ohio St. 3d 130
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 3, 1995·No. No. 94-2650·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and agree that respondent neglected two cases in violation of DR 6-101(A)(3). We also agree with the recommended sanction. Therefore, we hereby reprimand David Paul Rieser for this misconduct. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would dismiss the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rieser, 647 N.E.2d 1366, 72 Ohio St. 3d 130 (Ohio 1995).

647 N.E.2d 1366 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rieser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Columbus Bar Association v. Rieser.
2018 Ohio 3860 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2018)
Columbus Bar Assn. v. Rieser
2001 Ohio 1306 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Rieser
1995 Ohio 67 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)