Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill

546 N.E.2d 205, 46 Ohio St. 3d 605, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 304
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 1, 1989
DocketNo. D.D. 88-13
StatusPublished

This text of 546 N.E.2d 205 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill, 546 N.E.2d 205, 46 Ohio St. 3d 605, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 304 (Ohio 1989).

Opinion

On November 16, 1988, Timothy Joseph O’Neill was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.1 He was ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings totalling $992.37.

O’Neill moves the court for permission to pay the costs in installments of $50 per month after an initial payment of $150. This motion is granted.

An application for reinstatement to the practice of law filed by O’Neill will not be considered until all costs are paid in full.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill
530 N.E.2d 1317 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
546 N.E.2d 205, 46 Ohio St. 3d 605, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-oneill-ohio-1989.