Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill
530 N.E.2d 1317, 39 Ohio St. 3d 337, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 369
Opinion
The record substantiates that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(4). Accordingly, we concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill, 530 N.E.2d 1317, 39 Ohio St. 3d 337, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 369 (Ohio 1988).
530 N.E.2d 1317 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Akron Bar Ass'n v. Chandler
584 N.E.2d 677 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill
546 N.E.2d 205 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)