Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Melamed

580 N.E.2d 1077, 62 Ohio St. 3d 187, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2866
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 11, 1991
DocketNo. 91-860
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 580 N.E.2d 1077 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Melamed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Melamed, 580 N.E.2d 1077, 62 Ohio St. 3d 187, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2866 (Ohio 1991).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Therefore, we order that Bruce Alan Melamed be permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Martinez
2016 Ohio 2709 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Phillips
843 N.E.2d 775 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Sinclair
2004 Ohio 7014 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
580 N.E.2d 1077, 62 Ohio St. 3d 187, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-melamed-ohio-1991.