Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McClenaghan

565 N.E.2d 572, 57 Ohio St. 3d 21, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 18
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 9, 1991
DocketNo. 90-1131
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 565 N.E.2d 572 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McClenaghan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McClenaghan, 565 N.E.2d 572, 57 Ohio St. 3d 21, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 18 (Ohio 1991).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with relator that precedent supports imposing an indefinite suspension on respondent for his bribery conviction. Moreover, we find insufficient mitigating evidence to reduce that penalty. Respondent, formerly a high-ranking public official, bribed an employee in the division he had once headed. Letters of support do not easily mitigate such conduct. Therefore, we hereby adopt- the recommendation of the board and indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Sinclair
2004 Ohio 7014 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McClenaghan
634 N.E.2d 218 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
Disciplinary Counsel v. DiCarlantonio
1994 Ohio 144 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
565 N.E.2d 572, 57 Ohio St. 3d 21, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-mcclenaghan-ohio-1991.