Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lucey

586 N.E.2d 78, 63 Ohio St. 3d 143, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 236
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 4, 1992·No. No. 91-2164·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the findings and recommendation of the board. Accordingly, we indefinitely suspend Edward C. Lucey from the practice of law in Ohio with credit for time served since January 1, 1991. We condition his reinstatement upon proof that he regularly attends Alcoholics Anonymous meetings and has lived a sober life style for at least six months prior to his application for reinstatement. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lucey, 586 N.E.2d 78, 63 Ohio St. 3d 143, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 236 (Ohio 1992).

586 N.E.2d 78 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lucey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Fusco
2025 Ohio 5397 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2025)
Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Mason (Slip Opinion)
2017 Ohio 9215 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2017)