Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Levin
This text of 517 N.E.2d 892 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Levin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This court finds that respondent committed the disciplinary violations identified by the board. Accordingly, this court adopts the board’s recommendations. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for the misconduct found by the board in D.D. No. 86-22. It is further ordered that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio for the misconduct found by the board in D.D. No. 87-3. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
517 N.E.2d 892, 35 Ohio St. 3d 4, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-levin-ohio-1988.