Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Levin
517 N.E.2d 892, 35 Ohio St. 3d 4, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 5
Opinion
This court finds that respondent committed the disciplinary violations identified by the board. Accordingly, this court adopts the board’s recommendations. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for the misconduct found by the board in D.D. No. 86-22. It is further ordered that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio for the misconduct found by the board in D.D. No. 87-3. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Levin, 517 N.E.2d 892, 35 Ohio St. 3d 4, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 5 (Ohio 1988).
517 N.E.2d 892 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Levin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Statzer
2003 Ohio 6649 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
STATE EX REL. DISC. COUNSEL v. Lopez Wilson
634 N.W.2d 467 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2001)
State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska Supreme Court v. Wilson
634 N.W.2d 467 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2001)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Levin
635 N.E.2d 380 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
Bennice v. Bennice
612 N.E.2d 1256 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1992)