Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lagattuta

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lagattuta

774 A.2d 730, 565 Pa. 437, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 984
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lagattuta. Read the opinion of the Court — 821 A.2d 1202 →
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 8, 2001·No. No. 957 Disciplinary Docket No. 2·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2001, a Rule having been entered upon respondent by this Court on December 14, 2000, to show cause why the Order of this Court entered on August 25,1999, should not be modified and, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute, respondent’s probation is revoked and he is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that the respondent shall pay the ex[438]*438penses of the investigation and prosecution of the revocation proceedings pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lagattuta, 774 A.2d 730, 565 Pa. 437, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 984 (Pa. 2001).

774 A.2d 730 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lagattuta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.