Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lagattuta
This text of 774 A.2d 730 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lagattuta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2001, a Rule having been entered upon respondent by this Court on December 14, 2000, to show cause why the Order of this Court entered on August 25, 1999, should not be modified and, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute, respondent’s probation is revoked and he is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that the respondent shall pay the expenses of the investigation and prosecution of the revocation proceedings pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
774 A.2d 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-lagattuta-pa-2001.