Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones

609 N.E.2d 150, 66 Ohio St. 3d 74
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 7, 1993·No. No. 92-2538·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the evidence, we hereby adopt the findings of the board. We decline, however, to adopt the board’s recommended sanction, finding that respondent’s misconduct warrants a more severe penalty. Accordingly, respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyek, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones, 609 N.E.2d 150, 66 Ohio St. 3d 74 (Ohio 1993).

609 N.E.2d 150 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. King (Slip Opinion)
2019 Ohio 4715 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2019)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kellogg
2010 Ohio 3285 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)