Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones

609 N.E.2d 150, 66 Ohio St. 3d 74

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 7, 1993

DocketNo. 92-2538

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 609 N.E.2d 150 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones, 609 N.E.2d 150, 66 Ohio St. 3d 74 (Ohio 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the evidence, we hereby adopt the findings of the board. We decline, however, to adopt the board’s recommended sanction, finding that respondent’s misconduct warrants a more severe penalty. Accordingly, respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyek, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the evidence, we hereby adopt the findings of the board. We decline, however, to adopt the board’s recommended sanction, finding that respondent’s misconduct warrants a more severe penalty. Accordingly, respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyek, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

609 N.E.2d 150, 66 Ohio St. 3d 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-jones-ohio-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack