Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden

660 N.E.2d 1152, 74 Ohio St. 3d 601
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 1996
DocketNo. 95-2597
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 660 N.E.2d 1152 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden, 660 N.E.2d 1152, 74 Ohio St. 3d 601 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings of misconduct by the board. However, under these particular circumstances, we disagree with the board’s recommended sanction. Therefore, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months. Costs taxed to the respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would order a one-year suspension with six months stayed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Brien
899 N.E.2d 125 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Frenden
114 Ohio St. 3d 236 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden
671 N.E.2d 260 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden
1996 Ohio 251 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
660 N.E.2d 1152, 74 Ohio St. 3d 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-frenden-ohio-1996.