Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman

554 N.E.2d 1320, 51 Ohio St. 3d 98, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 225
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 23, 1990
DocketNo. D.D. 88-30
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 554 N.E.2d 1320 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman, 554 N.E.2d 1320, 51 Ohio St. 3d 98, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 225 (Ohio 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed this record, we agree that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(6). We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that he satisfactorily completes a two-year monitored probation period and complies with the five requirements enumerated in the panel’s opinion. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Bulson
2023 Ohio 4258 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
554 N.E.2d 1320, 51 Ohio St. 3d 98, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-freeman-ohio-1990.