Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Curren

664 N.E.2d 946, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1217, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2389
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 7, 1996·No. No. DD 87-28·Published

Opinion

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the respondent, Conrad Ashling Curren, Attorney Registration No. 0006247, last known address in Greenfield, Ohio, be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondent be taxed the costs of these proceedings in the amount $425.98, less the deposit of $500, for a total overage of $74.02, which overage shall be refunded to respondent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Curren (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 117, 529 N.E.2d 930.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Curren, 664 N.E.2d 946, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1217, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2389 (Ohio 1996).

664 N.E.2d 946 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Curren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Curren
529 N.E.2d 930 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)