Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Curren

529 N.E.2d 930, 39 Ohio St. 3d 117, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 326
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 12, 1988·No. No. D.D. 87-28·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. Our review of the record, however, requires us to order a more severe sanction than that recommended by the board. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Curren, 529 N.E.2d 930, 39 Ohio St. 3d 117, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 326 (Ohio 1988).

529 N.E.2d 930 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Curren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Curren
664 N.E.2d 946 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
In re Corrigan
546 N.E.2d 1315 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)