Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin

694 N.E.2d 899, 82 Ohio St. 3d 100

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 10, 1998

DocketNo. 97-2725

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 694 N.E.2d 899 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin, 694 N.E.2d 899, 82 Ohio St. 3d 100 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. We also note that in August 1994, we suspended respondent for eighteen [102]*102months, but stayed the suspension on the condition, among others, that he spend the entire time on probation under the guidance of a monitor. Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 75, 637 N.E.2d 296.

Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI