Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin

637 N.E.2d 296, 70 Ohio St. 3d 75
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 24, 1994
DocketNo. 92-1328
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 637 N.E.2d 296 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin, 637 N.E.2d 296, 70 Ohio St. 3d 75 (Ohio 1994).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Therefore, we order that Leroy Reuben Boykin be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of eighteen months; however, imposition of this sanction is stayed on the conditions established by the panel and adopted by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent and would indefinitely suspend respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Farah
2010 Ohio 2116 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin
1998 Ohio 581 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin
694 N.E.2d 899 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
637 N.E.2d 296, 70 Ohio St. 3d 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-boykin-ohio-1994.