Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Barish
This text of 829 A.2d 667 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Barish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,
v.
Marvin I. BARISH, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2003, upon consideration of the contention of respondent-attorney that he is suffering from a disabling condition which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to disciplinary charges brought against him in connection with Disciplinary Board Docket Nos. 15 DB 2002 and 85 DB 2002, it is hereby
ORDERED, that Marvin I. Barish is immediately transferred to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E., for an indefinite period and until further order of the Court. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings against the respondent-attorney shall meanwhile be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of testimony.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
829 A.2d 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-barish-pa-2003.