of N.Y. Estate of Celia Kates v. Pressly

132 A.D.3d 723, 17 N.Y.S.3d 662
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 2015·No. 2013-07397ON MOTION·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for a violation of Judiciary Law § 487, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.), dated June 7, 2013, as denied their second motion, in effect, for leave to reargue their prior motion for the entry of a default judgment against the defendants, which was denied in an order of the same court dated August 23, 2010.

Cross motion by the defendants, inter alia, to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated June 24, 2014, that branch of the cross motion which is to dismiss the appeal was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof, and the cross motion was otherwise denied.

Upon the papers filed in support of the cross motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the submission of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the branch of the cross motion which is to dismiss the appeal is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see Emigrant Mtge. Co., Inc. v Thevenin, 127 AD3d 919 [2015]; Basile v Wiggs, 117 AD3d 766, 766 [2014]; Naso v Naso, 102 AD3d 755, 756 [2013]; Rosenfeld v Baker, 78 AD3d 810, 811 [2010]; Peralta v All Weather Tire Sales & Serv., Inc., 58 AD3d 823, 823 [2009]).

Rivera, J.P., Roman, LaSalle and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

of N.Y. Estate of Celia Kates v. Pressly, 132 A.D.3d 723, 17 N.Y.S.3d 662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

132 A.D.3d 723 (of N.Y. Estate of Celia Kates v. Pressly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Einheber v. Sagalovich
140 A.D.3d 693 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)