Naso v. Naso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Naso v. Naso

102 A.D.3d 755, 957 N.Y.S.2d 876

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 16, 2013·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for [756]*756breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), entered November 22, 2011, which denied her motion for leave to reargue her opposition to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing her amended complaint as time-barred, which was granted in an order of the same court entered August 3, 2011.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see Matter of Aiani v Donovan, 98 AD3d 972 [2012]; HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Posy, 98 AD3d 945, 946 [2012]). Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for [756]*756breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), entered November 22, 2011, which denied her motion for leave to reargue her opposition to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing her amended complaint as time-barred, which was granted in an order of the same court entered August 3, 2011.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see Matter of Aiani v Donovan, 98 AD3d 972 [2012]; HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Posy, 98 AD3d 945, 946 [2012]). Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Naso v. Naso, 102 A.D.3d 755, 957 N.Y.S.2d 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

102 A.D.3d 755 (Naso v. Naso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related