Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11
390 F.2d 100
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided February 21, 1968·No. No. 9902·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the memorandum decision of the trial court and particularly in view of the jurisdictional restrictions contained in 50 App. U.S.C. § 460 (b) (3). Orderly classification of a registrant for military service is not punitive in nature. Compare United States v. Capson, 10 Cir., 347 F.2d 959. Appellant is not denied his right to ultimate judicial review of his claimed rights. Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375, 377, 75 S.Ct. 392, 99 L.Ed. 428.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11, 390 F.2d 100 (10th Cir. 1968).
390 F.2d 100 (Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Michael J. Zigmond, Movant v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16, Movees
396 F.2d 290 (First Circuit, 1968)
Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11
390 F.2d 100 (Tenth Circuit, 1968)