O'Donnell v. Bloomberg

33 A.D.3d 367, 822 N.Y.S.2d 253

Opinion

Supreme Court, New Judgment, York County (Carol Edmead, J.), entered February 10, 2006, dismissing a Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner offers no persuasive reason to reject respondents’ statement that, with one exception, no records responsive to petitioner’s FOIL requests could be found after a diligent search (Public Officers Law § 89 [3]; Matter of Baum v Tessler, 24 AD3d 214, 215 [2005]). The one record that respondents did find was, after an in camera inspection, correctly held to be exempt from disclosure as interagency material (Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [g]; see Matter of Fink v Lefkowitz, 47 NY2d 567, 571 [1979]). Concur—Tom, J.E, Saxe, Friedman, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Donnell v. Bloomberg, 33 A.D.3d 367, 822 N.Y.S.2d 253 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

33 A.D.3d 367 (O'Donnell v. Bloomberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fink v. Lefkowitz
393 N.E.2d 463 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Daum v. Tessler
24 A.D.3d 214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)