Odom v. Sutton

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 2003
Docket01-7832
StatusUnpublished

This text of Odom v. Sutton (Odom v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Odom v. Sutton, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7832

TIMOTHY LYNN ODOM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ERNEST SUTTON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-525-MU)

Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 4, 2003

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Lynn Odom, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Timothy Lynn Odom seeks to appeal the district court’s

September 28, 2001, order dismissing his petition filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) for failure to pay the filing fee. We dismiss

the appeal as moot because the district court re-instated the

petition after Odom paid the filing fee after dismissal.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeal
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Odom v. Sutton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odom-v-sutton-ca4-2003.