Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court. Read the opinion of the Court — 358 F. App'x 486
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2009·No. 09-6738·Unpublished

Opinion

Certiorari dismissed, April 26, 2010

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6738

CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MT. PLEASANT MUNICIPAL COURT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:08-cv-02660-PMD)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 28, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Alan Domin, CLAWSON & STAUBES, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v.

Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court, No. 2:08-cv-02660-PMD (D.S.C.

Mar. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court, (4th Cir. 2009).

Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court (Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related