Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court

Fourth Circuit

Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court

358 F. App'x 486

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2009·No. No. 09-6738·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court, No. 2:08-cv-02660-PMD, 2009 WL 902322 (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument [487]*487because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court, No. 2:08-cv-02660-PMD, 2009 WL 902322 (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument [487]*487because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court, 358 F. App'x 486 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

358 F. App'x 486 (Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Municipal Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related