O'Daniel v. Hayduk

59 A.D.2d 706, 398 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13669
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 5, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 59 A.D.2d 706 (O'Daniel v. Hayduk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Daniel v. Hayduk, 59 A.D.2d 706, 398 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

In proceedings to invalidate petitions designating John A. De Rario and Wilfred Manzo as candidates of the Homeowners, Tenants and Taxpayers Party in [707]*707the general election to be held on November 8, 1977 for the public offices of County Legislator, 12th and 13th Legislative District, Westchester County, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 4, 1977, which denied appellants’ motion to dismiss the proceedings for lack of jurisdiction. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, motion granted and proceedings dismissed. These proceedings were comménced by an order to show cause, signed on September 2, 1977 and returnable on September 27, 1977. On September 2, 1977 the petitioners-respondents mailed copies of the order and accompanying petition to the appellants. Although the order to show cause contained language concerning service by mail, the space provided for indicating the final date for service by mail was left blank. Dates were inserted in all other blanks. The absence of a date for final mailing had the effect of striking the provision for substituted service. Therefore, the mode of service utilized by the petitioners was not in strict compliance with the order to show cause and, since this is a jurisdictional defect, we are constrained to reverse (see Matter of Bruno v Ackerson, 51 AD2d 1051, affd 39 NY2d 718). Hopkins J. P., Latham, Margett and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Stark v. Williams
188 N.Y.S.3d 205 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Felder v. Tischler
174 N.Y.S.3d 280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
ANGLETTI, FRANCIS J. v. MORREALE, MARCUS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Angletti v. Morreale
131 A.D.3d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Rotanelli v. Westchester County Board of Elections
41 Misc. 3d 254 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)
Stern v. Garfinkle
22 A.D.3d 694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Marcoccia v. Garfinkle
307 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Zambelli v. Dillon
242 A.D.2d 353 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Mcgreevy v. Simon
220 A.D.2d 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Stinson v. Wilson
218 A.D.2d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Matter of Berman v. Bd. of Elections of the County of Nassau
497 N.E.2d 962 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Sahler v. Callahan
92 A.D.2d 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Paukovits v. Zoning Board of Appeals
76 A.D.2d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 A.D.2d 706, 398 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/odaniel-v-hayduk-nyappdiv-1977.