Home/New York Court of Appeals/Ocwen Federal Bank FSB v. DeLuxe Building Systems

Ocwen Federal Bank FSB v. DeLuxe Building Systems

818 N.E.2d 651, 3 N.Y.3d 688, 785 N.Y.S.2d 10, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 2213
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 7, 2004
StatusPublished

This text of 818 N.E.2d 651 (Ocwen Federal Bank FSB v. DeLuxe Building Systems) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ocwen Federal Bank FSB v. DeLuxe Building Systems, 818 N.E.2d 651, 3 N.Y.3d 688, 785 N.Y.S.2d 10, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 2213 (N.Y. 2004).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order of the Appellate Division from which leave is sought [689]*689does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. The judgment, the appeal from which was dismissed by the Appellate Division, entered pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, does not constitute a final judgment because the stipulation was entered into “without prejudice” (see Herzfeld & Stern v Beck, 82 NY2d 789 [1993]; Russo v New York Life Ins. Co., 95 NY2d 847 [2000]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russo v. New York Life Insurance Company
735 N.E.2d 1285 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
Herzfeld & Stern, Inc. v. Beck
82 N.Y.2d 789 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
818 N.E.2d 651, 3 N.Y.3d 688, 785 N.Y.S.2d 10, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 2213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ocwen-federal-bank-fsb-v-deluxe-building-systems-ny-2004.