Herzfeld & Stern, Inc. v. Beck
82 N.Y.2d 789
This text of 82 N.Y.2d 789 (Herzfeld & Stern, Inc. v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Herzfeld & Stern, Inc. v. Beck, 82 N.Y.2d 789 (N.Y. 1993).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution and that the "so ordered” stipulation does not qualify as a final judgment because it was entered into "without prejudice.”
[790]*790Judge Smith taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ocwen Federal Bank FSB v. DeLuxe Building Systems
818 N.E.2d 651 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
82 N.Y.2d 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herzfeld-stern-inc-v-beck-ny-1993.