O'Connor v. US Cellular Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided March 22, 2023·No. Civil Action No. 2020-2071·Published

Opinion

Figure 1 – Alleged Relationship Between Defendants

Allison Cryor DiNardo Telephone and Data William Vail Systems, Inc.

80% L.P. owner 5%

L.P. L.P. 90% 5% Sole United States Cellular Advantage Spectrum, shareowner; G.P. Corporation L.P. owner King Street Wireless, 10% King Street Wireless, Inc. L.P. L.P. 90% Sole shareowner; G.P. L.P. owner 10% 90% Advantage Spectrum, Carroll PCS, Inc Carroll Wireless, L.P. L.P.

Sole L.P. shareowner; G.P. 90% owner 10% Barat Wireless, Inc. Barat Wireless, L.P.

Source: Second Amended Complaint ¶¶ 23-32, ECF No. 118. "G.P." stands for general partner. "L.P." stands for limited partner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Connor v. US Cellular Corporation, (D.D.C. 2023).

O'Connor v. US Cellular Corporation (O'Connor v. US Cellular Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.