O'Connor v. US Cellular Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided March 31, 2022·No. Civil Action No. 2020-2070·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex re/. MARK J. O’>CONNOR and SARA F. LEIBMAN

Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-cv-2070 (TSC)

Vv.

UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION, ef al.,

Defendants.

APPENDIX

Figure 1 — Ownership Structure of Advantage Spectrum, L.P. as claimed by Defendants

Sole William Vail Allison Cryor Shareholder King Street Telephone and Data DiNardo Wireless, Inc. Systems, Inc.

100% 100% G.P, 84.26% ¥ ¥

United States Cellular Corporation

100%

Sunshine Spectrum, Inc.

King Street Wireless, L.P.

Frequency Advantage, L.P.

USSC Wireless Investment, Inc.

G.P. L.P. 10% Equity S0% Equity

Advantage Spectrum, L.P. Applicant

Page 1 of 2 Figure 2 — Ownership Structure of Advantage Spectrum, L.P. as alleged by Relators

William Vail

Frequency Alleged de Advantage, L.P. facto manager 1757 No Actual Control

Allison Cryor

Nonesuch,

Page 2 of 2

DiNardo

Advantage Spectrum, L.P.

Applicant

Sole

Shareholder

King Street Wireless, Inc.

Alleged control

q7 66-95 —

ze

a

Telephone and Data

Systems, Inc.

84.26%

Alleged control 752

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Connor v. US Cellular Corporation, (D.D.C. 2022).

O'Connor v. US Cellular Corporation (O'Connor v. US Cellular Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.