O'Connor v. US Cellular Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided March 31, 2022·No. Civil Action No. 2020-2070·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex re/. MARK J. O’>CONNOR and SARA F. LEIBMAN

Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-cv-2070 (TSC)

Vv.

UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION, ef al.,

Defendants.

APPENDIX Figure 1 — Ownership Structure of Advantage Spectrum, L.P. as claimed by Defendants

Sole William Vail Allison Cryor Shareholder King Street Telephone and Data DiNardo Wireless, Inc. Systems, Inc.

100% 100% G.P, 84.26% ¥ ¥

United States Cellular Corporation

100%

Sunshine Spectrum, Inc.

King Street Wireless, L.P.

Frequency Advantage, L.P.

USSC Wireless Investment, Inc.

G.P. L.P. 10% Equity S0% Equity

Advantage Spectrum, L.P. Applicant

Page 1 of 2

Figure 2 — Ownership Structure of Advantage Spectrum, L.P. as alleged by Relators William Vail

100%

Sunshine Spectrum, Inc.

Frequency Alleged de Advantage, L.P. facto manager 1757 No Actual Control

Allison Cryor

100% Nonesuch, Page 2 of 2 DiNardo

Advantage Spectrum, L.P.

Applicant Sole Shareholder

King Street Wireless, Inc.

Alleged control

q7 66-95 —

ze

a Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.

84.26%

United States Cellular Corporation

100%

USSC Wireless Investment, Inc.

Alleged control 752

King Street Wireless, L.P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Connor v. US Cellular Corporation, (D.D.C. 2022).

O'Connor v. US Cellular Corporation (O'Connor v. US Cellular Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.