O'Connell v. Jacobs
611 N.E.2d 289, 81 N.Y.2d 797, 595 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 203
This text of 611 N.E.2d 289 (O'Connell v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O'Connell v. Jacobs, 611 N.E.2d 289, 81 N.Y.2d 797, 595 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 203 (N.Y. 1993).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. We agree for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division (181 AD2d 1064) that the admissible evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict.
Concur: Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Ti-tone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Richbell Information Services, Inc. v. Jupiter Partners L.P.
32 A.D.3d 150 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Wolff v. Mahrer
273 A.D.2d 812 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Jarvis v. Eastman
202 A.D.2d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
611 N.E.2d 289, 81 N.Y.2d 797, 595 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oconnell-v-jacobs-ny-1993.