Ochoa v. New York City Department of Education
This text of Ochoa v. New York City Department of Education (Ochoa v. New York City Department of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AL LE an ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: __99/01/2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ISABEL OCHOA, Plaintiff, . 20-cv-09014 (ALC) -against- NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF ORDER EDUCATION, ET AL., Defendants. ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s letter dated August 26, 2021 advising the Court of the error in her original IFP application. ECF No. 39. The Court hereby VACATES the order granting Plaintiff’s original IFP application. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff’s revised application is hereby DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to pay the $400.00 filing fee by no later than October 1, 2021. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).
SO ORDERED. Dated: September 1, 2021 New York, New York ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ochoa v. New York City Department of Education, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ochoa-v-new-york-city-department-of-education-nysd-2021.