O'BRIEN v. State
362 S.W.3d 72, 2012 WL 1052725, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 422
Opinion
*73 ORDER
James O’Brien appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'BRIEN v. State, 362 S.W.3d 72, 2012 WL 1052725, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 422 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
362 S.W.3d 72 (O'BRIEN v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
KLEIHAUER v. State
362 S.W.3d 72 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)