O'BRIEN v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

O'BRIEN v. State

362 S.W.3d 72, 2012 WL 1052725, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 422

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 27, 2012

DocketWD 73575

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 362 S.W.3d 72 (O'BRIEN v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'BRIEN v. State, 362 S.W.3d 72, 2012 WL 1052725, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 422 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

*73 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

James O’Brien appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*73 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

James O’Brien appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

362 S.W.3d 72, 2012 WL 1052725, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/obrien-v-state-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack