KLEIHAUER v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

KLEIHAUER v. State

362 S.W.3d 72, 2012 WL 1034219, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 424

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 27, 2012

DocketWD 73544

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 362 S.W.3d 72 (KLEIHAUER v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

KLEIHAUER v. State, 362 S.W.3d 72, 2012 WL 1034219, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 424 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Steven C. Kleihauer appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Lafayette County, Missouri, denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing, in which Klei-hauer’s motion claimed ineffective assistance of counsel. Finding no error, we affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a legal memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Steven C. Kleihauer appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Lafayette County, Missouri, denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing, in which Klei-hauer’s motion claimed ineffective assistance of counsel. Finding no error, we affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a legal memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

362 S.W.3d 72, 2012 WL 1034219, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kleihauer-v-state-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack