O'Brien v. . Fitzgerald

New York Court of Appeals

O'Brien v. . Fitzgerald

44 N.E. 1121, 150 N.Y. 572, 1896 N.Y. LEXIS 1027

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 27, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 44 N.E. 1121 (O'Brien v. . Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Brien v. . Fitzgerald, 44 N.E. 1121, 150 N.Y. 572, 1896 N.Y. LEXIS 1027 (N.Y. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion below, and the questions answered as follows:

1st. Whether the amended complaint in this action sets forth a cause of action in equity. Answer, no.

2d. Whether there has been an improper joinder of causes of action in the amended complaint herein. Answer, yes.

Concur — Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett and Vann, JJ.

Dissent — Andrews, Ch. J., Haight and Martin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI