Oberholtzer v. Huffman
67 S.E.2d 263, 234 N.C. 399, 1951 N.C. LEXIS 462
Opinion
Special damages, that is, damages which are the natural but not necessary result of the alleged wrongful act of the defendant, must be pleaded with sufficient particularity to put the defendant on notice. Conrad v. Shuford, 174 N.C. 719, 94 S.E. 424; Binder v. Ac ceptance Corp., 222 N.C. 512, 23 S.E. 2d 894. This the plaintiff has done. The allegations stricken are a proper and necessary part of his complaint. Hence the order striking same must be
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oberholtzer v. Huffman, 67 S.E.2d 263, 234 N.C. 399, 1951 N.C. LEXIS 462 (N.C. 1951).
67 S.E.2d 263 (Oberholtzer v. Huffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hopkins v. Mwr Mgmt. Co.
2017 NCBC 90 (North Carolina Business Court, 2017)
Smart Online, Inc. v. Opensite Technologies, Inc.
2003 NCBC 5 (North Carolina Business Court, 2003)
Windfield Corp. v. McCallum Inspection Co.
196 S.E.2d 607 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)
Thacker v. Ward
140 S.E.2d 23 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)