OBERHART v. State

364 S.W.3d 268, 2012 WL 1338166, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 506
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 17, 2012·No. ED 96812·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Patrick Oberhart, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OBERHART v. State, 364 S.W.3d 268, 2012 WL 1338166, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 506 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

364 S.W.3d 268 (OBERHART v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McEwen v. State
364 S.W.3d 268 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)