McEwen v. State

364 S.W.3d 268, 2012 WL 1338365, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 511
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 17, 2012·No. ED 96845·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry A. McEwen appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after a partial evidentiary hearing. The motion court did not clearly err in denying McEwen’s request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McEwen v. State, 364 S.W.3d 268, 2012 WL 1338365, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 511 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

364 S.W.3d 268 (McEwen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

OBERHART v. State
364 S.W.3d 268 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)