Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Oakley v. East Lake Drywall

Oakley v. East Lake Drywall

641 So. 2d 515, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8478, 1994 WL 463517
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 30, 1994
DocketNo. 92-3326
StatusPublished

This text of 641 So. 2d 515 (Oakley v. East Lake Drywall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oakley v. East Lake Drywall, 641 So. 2d 515, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8478, 1994 WL 463517 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue of whether claimant was entitled to benefits as a statutory employee, pursuant to sections 440.02(13)(c) and 440.10(1), Florida Statutes, was not raised before the judge of compensation claims (JCC), and therefore not properly raised for the first time on appeal. Cooley v. McCallister, 468 So.2d 488 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The JCC’s determination that the claimant was an independent contractor is supported by competent substantial evidence, and is affirmed.

ERVIN, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cooley v. McCallister
468 So. 2d 488 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
641 So. 2d 515, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8478, 1994 WL 463517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oakley-v-east-lake-drywall-fladistctapp-1994.