Oakley v. East Lake Drywall
641 So. 2d 515, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8478, 1994 WL 463517
Opinion
The issue of whether claimant was entitled to benefits as a statutory employee, pursuant to sections 440.02(13)(c) and 440.10(1), Florida Statutes, was not raised before the judge of compensation claims (JCC), and therefore not properly raised for the first time on appeal. Cooley v. McCallister, 468 So.2d 488 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The JCC’s determination that the claimant was an independent contractor is supported by competent substantial evidence, and is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oakley v. East Lake Drywall, 641 So. 2d 515, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8478, 1994 WL 463517 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
641 So. 2d 515 (Oakley v. East Lake Drywall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cooley v. McCallister
468 So. 2d 488 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)