Cooley v. McCallister

468 So. 2d 488, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1164, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14154
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 1985·No. No. AZ-229·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue of whether claimant was informed that he was released to light duty work was not raised before the deputy commissioner and, therefore, not properly raised for the first time on appeal. Troni-caría Products, Inc. v. Andrews, 461 So.2d 998 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Otherwise, the deputy commissioner’s order is supported by competent, substantial evidence and is affirmed.

JOANOS, THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooley v. McCallister, 468 So. 2d 488, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1164, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14154 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

468 So. 2d 488 (Cooley v. McCallister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oakley v. East Lake Drywall
641 So. 2d 515 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)