Cooley v. McCallister

468 So. 2d 488, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1164, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14154
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 9, 1985
DocketNo. AZ-229
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 468 So. 2d 488 (Cooley v. McCallister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cooley v. McCallister, 468 So. 2d 488, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1164, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14154 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue of whether claimant was informed that he was released to light duty work was not raised before the deputy commissioner and, therefore, not properly raised for the first time on appeal. Troni-caría Products, Inc. v. Andrews, 461 So.2d 998 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Otherwise, the deputy commissioner’s order is supported by competent, substantial evidence and is affirmed.

JOANOS, THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oakley v. East Lake Drywall
641 So. 2d 515 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 So. 2d 488, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1164, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooley-v-mccallister-fladistctapp-1985.