OAKHURST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, INC. v. Hendrix

679 S.E.2d 742, 298 Ga. App. 226, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 1851, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 584
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 21, 2009
DocketA09A0464
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 679 S.E.2d 742 (OAKHURST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, INC. v. Hendrix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
OAKHURST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, INC. v. Hendrix, 679 S.E.2d 742, 298 Ga. App. 226, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 1851, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 584 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Barnes, Judge.

Louise Hendrix sued Oakhurst Presbyterian Church, Inc. after she fell on a staircase at the church and was injured. Oakhurst filed a motion for summary judgment which the court denied before the start of trial. At trial, Oakhurst moved for a directed verdict, which the trial court also denied. The jury awarded a judgment of $17,000 for Hendrix, and Oakhurst appeals.

1. In its sole enumerated error, Oakhurst argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment because Hendrix failed to meet her burden of showing that the church had actual knowledge of the defect in the stairs, and that she also lacked knowledge of the defect, despite the use of ordinary care.

However, “after verdict and judgment, it is too late to review a judgment denying a summary judgment for that judgment becomes moot when the court reviews the evidence upon the trial of the case. [Cits.]” Phillips v. Abel, 141 Ga. App. 291 (1) (233 SE2d 384) (1977); Mullinax v. Singleton, 139 Ga. App. 704, 705 (1) (229 SE2d 518) (1976). Accordingly, because the denial of Oakhurst’s summary judgment motion presents nothing for our review, this enumeration is meritless. See Valesco v. Chambless, 295 Ga. App. 376, 378 (2) (671 SE2d 870) (2008).

2. Hendrix’s motion to dismiss is denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Miller, C. J., and Andrews, P J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Theodore Rowe v. Law Offices of Ben C. Brodhead
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012
Rowe v. Law Offices of Ben C. Brodhead, P.C.
735 S.E.2d 39 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
BLAZI v. Rich
702 S.E.2d 768 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
679 S.E.2d 742, 298 Ga. App. 226, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 1851, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oakhurst-presbyterian-church-inc-v-hendrix-gactapp-2009.