Home/Texas Supreme Court/O. M. Franklin Serum Co. v. C. A. Hoover & Son

O. M. Franklin Serum Co. v. C. A. Hoover & Son

418 S.W.2d 482
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 19, 1967
DocketB-91
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 418 S.W.2d 482 (O. M. Franklin Serum Co. v. C. A. Hoover & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O. M. Franklin Serum Co. v. C. A. Hoover & Son, 418 S.W.2d 482 (Tex. 1967).

Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

In McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc., Tex.Sup., 416 S.W.2d 787, we adopted the rule of strict liability in tort with respect to sellers of defective products which cause physical harm to persons. The Court of Civil Appeals has held in the present case that the seller of a defective product is also subject to strict liability for damage caused to the property of the ultimate consumer. 410 S.W.2d 272. We are in agreement with this holding and accordingly disapprove the opinions in Brown v. Howard, Tex.Civ.App., 285 S.W.2d 752 (wr. ref. n. r. e.), and Cruz v. Ansul Chemical Co., Tex.Civ.App., 399 S.W.2d 944 (wr. ref. n. r. e.), in so far as they are inconsistent therewith. The application for writ of error is Refused, No Reversible Error. See Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Wyk v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.
345 N.W.2d 81 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1984)
Two Rivers Company v. Curtiss Breeding Service, Division of Searle Agriculture Inc., Defendant- Hi-Pro Feeds, Inc.
624 F.2d 1242 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Mid Continent Aircraft Corp. v. Curry County Spraying Service, Inc.
572 S.W.2d 308 (Texas Supreme Court, 1978)
Riverside Chemical Co. v. Hanson
567 S.W.2d 880 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1978)
General Motors Corp. v. Simmons
558 S.W.2d 855 (Texas Supreme Court, 1977)
Mid Continent Aircraft Corp. v. Curry County Spraying Service, Inc.
553 S.W.2d 935 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Cloud v. Kit Manufacturing Co.
563 P.2d 248 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1977)
Hartzell Propeller Company v. Alexander
485 S.W.2d 943 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Gravis v. Abbott Laboratories
462 S.W.2d 410 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Monsanto Company v. Thrasher
463 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Cova v. Harley Davidson Motor Co.
182 N.W.2d 800 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1970)
Pizza Inn, Inc. v. Tiffany
454 S.W.2d 420 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Freitas v. Twin City Fisherman's Cooperative Ass'n
452 S.W.2d 931 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)
GEIGY CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. Hall
449 S.W.2d 115 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Eyerly Aircraft Co. v. Jack Killian, Individually and for and on Behalf of Jan Killian, a Minor
414 F.2d 591 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
FMC Corporation v. Burns
444 S.W.2d 315 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Pittsburg Coca-Cola Bottling Works of Pittsburg v. Ponder
443 S.W.2d 546 (Texas Supreme Court, 1969)
OM Franklin Serum Company v. CA Hoover & Son
437 S.W.2d 613 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Martel v. Duffy-Mott Corporation
166 N.W.2d 541 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1968)
Humber v. Morton
426 S.W.2d 554 (Texas Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
418 S.W.2d 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/o-m-franklin-serum-co-v-c-a-hoover-son-tex-1967.