O. C. Boyls, Doing Business as Boyls Dusting and Spraying Service v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
This text of 352 F.2d 63 (O. C. Boyls, Doing Business as Boyls Dusting and Spraying Service v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant is engaged in the aerial crop dusting business. He maintains an office, hangar and warehouse at the Municipal Airport in Sinton, Texas. There were numerous employees working at this location. None but the airplane pilot and flagman ever went upon the farm in the performance of the functions of the business.
The Wages and Hours Division of the Department of Labor agreed that the pilot and the flagman were exempt from the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, but contended that the employees at the office, hangar and warehouse who never went upon the farm were covered. Appellant claimed exemption of these employees under the provisions of Section 13(a) (6) of the Act. The District Court denied exemption for all employees other than the pilot and the flagmen.
In Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company v. McComb, 337 U.S. 755, 69 S.Ct. 1274, 93 L.Ed. 1672 (1949) it was held that the exemptions of Section 13 (a) (6) apply only to work performed by a farmer or on a farm. This disposes of the question raised in this appeal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
352 F.2d 63, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4213, 1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,669, 52 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 31,730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/o-c-boyls-doing-business-as-boyls-dusting-and-spraying-service-v-w-ca5-1965.