O. C. Allen v. L. S. Nelson, Warden

484 F.2d 960
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 9, 1973·No. 73-1339·Published

Opinion

484 F.2d 960

O. C. ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
L. S. NELSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 73-1339.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 9, 1973.

Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Edward A. Hinz, Jr., Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Edward P. O'Brien, Asst. Attys. Gen., John T. Murphy, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent-appellant.

William Mandel, David T. Alexander, Petty, Andrews, Tufts & Jackson, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellee.

Before BROWNING, TRASK, and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated in the district court's opinion (see 354 F.Supp. 505), the court's order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O. C. Allen v. L. S. Nelson, Warden, 484 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1973).

484 F.2d 960 (O. C. Allen v. L. S. Nelson, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. Nelson
354 F. Supp. 505 (N.D. California, 1973)
Allen v. Nelson
484 F.2d 960 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)