O. C. Allen v. L. S. Nelson, Warden
This text of 484 F.2d 960 (O. C. Allen v. L. S. Nelson, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
O. C. ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
L. S. NELSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 73-1339.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 9, 1973.
Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Edward A. Hinz, Jr., Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Edward P. O'Brien, Asst. Attys. Gen., John T. Murphy, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent-appellant.
William Mandel, David T. Alexander, Petty, Andrews, Tufts & Jackson, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellee.
Before BROWNING, TRASK, and CHOY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
For the reasons stated in the district court's opinion (see 354 F.Supp. 505), the court's order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
484 F.2d 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/o-c-allen-v-l-s-nelson-warden-ca9-1973.