Allen v. Nelson

484 F.2d 960
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 9, 1973·No. No. 73-1339·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion (see 354 F.Supp. 505), the court’s order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. Nelson, 484 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1973).

484 F.2d 960 (Allen v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toussaint v. Rushen
553 F. Supp. 1365 (N.D. California, 1983)
Johnson v. Duffy
588 F.2d 740 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
United States Ex Rel. Hoss v. Cuyler
452 F. Supp. 256 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1978)
Wright v. Enomoto
462 F. Supp. 397 (N.D. California, 1978)
Nadeau v. Helgemoe
423 F. Supp. 1250 (D. New Hampshire, 1976)
United States Ex Rel. Bennett v. Prasse
408 F. Supp. 988 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)
O. C. Allen v. L. S. Nelson, Warden
484 F.2d 960 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)