Nyree S. v. Gregory C.

99 A.D.3d 561, 951 N.Y.2d 874

This text of 99 A.D.3d 561 (Nyree S. v. Gregory C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nyree S. v. Gregory C., 99 A.D.3d 561, 951 N.Y.2d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

[562]*562The record shows that the incarcerated respondent appeared telephonically at a hearing and was grossly disrespectful to the court. When the court admonished respondent, he responded in a manner indicating that he had no respect for the court’s authority. The court therefore acted properly in excluding respondent from the proceedings by disconnecting his telephone connection, and his conduct constituted a knowing and willful default (see Matter of Anita L. v Damon N., 54 AD3d 630 [1st Dept 2008]; Matter of Kondratyeva v Yapi, 13 AD3d 376 [2d Dept 2004]; Matter of McConnell v Montagriff, 233 AD2d 512 [2d Dept 1996]). Accordingly, since no appeal lies from an order entered upon the aggrieved party’s default, the appeal is dismissed (see CPLR 5511; Anita L., 54 AD3d at 631). Concur— Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Andrias, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kondratyeva v. Yapi
13 A.D.3d 376 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Anita L. v. Damon N.
54 A.D.3d 630 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
McConnell v. Montagriff
233 A.D.2d 512 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.3d 561, 951 N.Y.2d 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nyree-s-v-gregory-c-nyappdiv-2012.