Nyree S. v. Gregory C.

99 A.D.3d 561, 951 N.Y.2d 874
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 16, 2012·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

[562]*562The record shows that the incarcerated respondent appeared telephonically at a hearing and was grossly disrespectful to the court. When the court admonished respondent, he responded in a manner indicating that he had no respect for the court’s authority. The court therefore acted properly in excluding respondent from the proceedings by disconnecting his telephone connection, and his conduct constituted a knowing and willful default (see Matter of Anita L. v Damon N., 54 AD3d 630 [1st Dept 2008]; Matter of Kondratyeva v Yapi, 13 AD3d 376 [2d Dept 2004]; Matter of McConnell v Montagriff, 233 AD2d 512 [2d Dept 1996]). Accordingly, since no appeal lies from an order entered upon the aggrieved party’s default, the appeal is dismissed (see CPLR 5511; Anita L., 54 AD3d at 631). Concur— Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Andrias, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nyree S. v. Gregory C., 99 A.D.3d 561, 951 N.Y.2d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

99 A.D.3d 561 (Nyree S. v. Gregory C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Rachel QQ. v. Jaime QQ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026
Matter of R.B. v. I.S.
2024 NY Slip Op 50228(U) (Richmond Family Court, 2024)
Matter of Smith v. Bullock
158 N.Y.S.3d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Jenny F. v. Felix C.
121 A.D.3d 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Mayer v. Vilar
113 A.D.3d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)