Matter of Jenny F. v. Felix C.

121 A.D.3d 413, 993 N.Y.S.2d 698
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 2, 2014
Docket13106 13105
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 121 A.D.3d 413 (Matter of Jenny F. v. Felix C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Jenny F. v. Felix C., 121 A.D.3d 413, 993 N.Y.S.2d 698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Susan K. Knipps, J.), entered on or about February 22, 2013, which denied respondent father’s motion to vacate a five-year order of protection entered after an inquest conducted upon his default, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order of protection, same court and Judge, entered on or about December 3, 2012, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

Respondent failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear at the hearing on the family offense petition (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; see e.g. Matter of Yadori Marie F. [Osvaldo F.], 111 AD3d 418, 419 [1st Dept 2013]). His contention that he “totally forgot” about the hearing date and thought his employer would remind him of the date is unreasonable. Respondent was present during the scheduling of the hearing and it was his responsibility to ensure that he appeared on the scheduled date (see e.g. Matter of Yadori, 111 AD3d at 419). Further, the court properly denied his counsel’s request for an adjournment, as counsel failed to offer any explanation for respondent’s absence (Matter of Keith H. [Logann M.K.], 113 AD3d 555, 556 [1st Dept 2014], lv denied 23 NY3d 902 [2014]). Since respondent failed to offer a reasonable excuse for his default, we need not determine whether he offered a meritorious defense to the family offense petition (see Matter of Yadori, 111 AD3d at 419).

No appeal lies from the order of protection, which was entered upon respondent’s default (CELR 5511; see e.g. Matter of Nyree S. v Gregory C., 99 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 854 [2012]).

Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Saxe, Richter, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Sharon M. v. Elmer Gabriel M.
190 N.Y.S.3d 41 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Steven L. v. Audrey L.
2020 NY Slip Op 3741 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Ignatieva v. Sullivan
2019 NY Slip Op 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Messiah G. (Giselle F.)
2019 NY Slip Op 45 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Cristalyn G. (Elvis S.)
2018 NY Slip Op 1254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Crai v. Crai
134 A.D.3d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 A.D.3d 413, 993 N.Y.S.2d 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-jenny-f-v-felix-c-nyappdiv-2014.