NYCTL 2015-A Trust v. Masin

2021 NY Slip Op 01724
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 23, 2021
DocketIndex No. 650351/16 Appeal No. 13410N Case No. 2020-02841
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 01724 (NYCTL 2015-A Trust v. Masin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
NYCTL 2015-A Trust v. Masin, 2021 NY Slip Op 01724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

NYCTL 2015-A Trust v Masin (2021 NY Slip Op 01724)
NYCTL 2015-A Trust v Masin
2021 NY Slip Op 01724
Decided on March 23, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: March 23, 2021
Before: Webber, J.P., Oing, Kennedy, Scarpulla, JJ.

Index No. 650351/16 Appeal No. 13410N Case No. 2020-02841

[*1]NYCTL 2015-A Trust, et al., Plaintiffs,

v

George G. Masin, Defendant-Respondent, New York City Environmental Control Board, et al., Defendants. Adam Plotch, Non-Party Appellant.


Stern & Stern, New York (Pamela Smith of counsel), for appellant.

Stuart S. Perry, PC, New York (Stuart Perry of counsel), for respondent.



Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kathryn E. Freed, J.), entered on or about November 29, 2019, which, inter alia, determined that the foreclosure auction purchaser breached the terms of sale by failing to close by the time of essence date and permitted defendant tax debtor George G. Masin to exercise his right of redemption and satisfy an outstanding tax lien, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

After Masin's first motion to vacate was denied, plaintiffs discontinued the action, and the judgment of foreclosure and sale was vacated. We take judicial notice of this undisputed fact (see Matter of Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v Archibald, 124 AD3d 480, 481 [1st Dept 2015]). The appellant is not a party to this action, and he declined to intervene despite the opportunity to do so. Accordingly, the rights of the parties would not be affected by a determination of this appeal, and the appeal is moot (Reyes v Sequeira, 64 AD3d 500, 505-506 [1st Dept 2009]). THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: March 23, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

NYCTL 2015-A Trust v. Masin
2021 NY Slip Op 01724 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 01724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nyctl-2015-a-trust-v-masin-nyappdiv-2021.