NYCTL 1998-2 Trust v. Salem Realty
This text of 69 A.D.3d 593 (NYCTL 1998-2 Trust v. Salem Realty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Supreme Court, upon reargument, correctly determined that it had erred in granting that branch of Salem Realty’s motion which was to declare the judgment of foreclosure and sale dated October 19, 2001, null and void as to all parties. Instead, as the Supreme Court correctly determined, upon reargument, that judgment was not null and void as to all parties, but rather, was null and void only as to Salem Realty. This determination was proper based upon Salem Realty’s demonstration that it had not properly been served, and was not based on the merits (see NYCTL 1998-2 Trust v Salem Realty, 69 AD3d —, 2009 NY Slip Op 00120 [2009] [decided herewith]). Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 A.D.3d 593, 891 N.Y.2d 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nyctl-1998-2-trust-v-salem-realty-nyappdiv-2010.