NYCTL 1998-2 Trust v. Salem Realty

69 A.D.3d 593, 891 N.Y.2d 284
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 5, 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Supreme Court, upon reargument, correctly determined that it had erred in granting that branch of Salem Realty’s motion which was to declare the judgment of foreclosure and sale dated October 19, 2001, null and void as to all parties. Instead, as the Supreme Court correctly determined, upon reargument, that judgment was not null and void as to all parties, but rather, was null and void only as to Salem Realty. This determination was proper based upon Salem Realty’s demonstration that it had not properly been served, and was not based on the merits (see NYCTL 1998-2 Trust v Salem Realty, 69 AD3d —, 2009 NY Slip Op 00120 [2009] [decided herewith]). Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NYCTL 1998-2 Trust v. Salem Realty, 69 A.D.3d 593, 891 N.Y.2d 284 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

69 A.D.3d 593 (NYCTL 1998-2 Trust v. Salem Realty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

NYCTL 1998-2 Trust v. Salem Realty
69 A.D.3d 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)