NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. 251-18 GCP Corp.

293 A.D.2d 456, 739 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3336
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 293 A.D.2d 456 (NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. 251-18 GCP Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. 251-18 GCP Corp., 293 A.D.2d 456, 739 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a tax lien, the defendant 251-18 GCP Corp., also known as GCP Corp., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated September 11, 2000, which denied its motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated June 26, 1998, entered upon its failure to appear or answer the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondents.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the appellant did not establish the existence of a meritorious defense to this foreclosure action, and thus is not entitled to vacatur of the judgment of foreclosure and sale (see Taieb v Hilton Hotels Corp., 60 NY2d 725).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Contimortgage Corp. v. DeRham
299 A.D.2d 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
293 A.D.2d 456, 739 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nyctl-1996-1-trust-v-251-18-gcp-corp-nyappdiv-2002.